Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2000 12:14:10 +0300 From: "Igor' Robul'" <igor@raduga.dyndns.org> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Are there pitfalls/warnings for CVSup'ing ports-all only? Message-ID: <20001206121410.A16105@linux.rainbow> In-Reply-To: <20001206002215.I99903@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com>; from cjclark@reflexnet.net on Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 12:22:15AM -0800 References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0012051847370.22690-100000@shell1.aracnet.com> <20001206002215.I99903@149.211.6.64.reflexcom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 12:22:15AM -0800, Crist J . Clark wrote: > On Tue, Dec 05, 2000 at 07:01:43PM -0800, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > > changes from 4.0 to 4.1 to 4.2 that might break a RELENG_4 port installed > > on a 4.1-R machine? Is there an UPDATING.TXT-like file someplace that Ports system DOES NOT have different branches. All ports are CURRENT -- Igor' Robul', Unix System Administrator & Programmer @ sanatorium "Raduga", Sochi, Russia http://www.brainbench.com/transcript.jsp?pid=304744 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001206121410.A16105>