Date: 23 Jan 2001 12:26:30 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: "Yonny Cardenas B." <ycardena@yahoo.com>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Kernel programming Message-ID: <xzpk87mh5ll.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Alexander Langer's message of "Tue, 23 Jan 2001 12:20:56 %2B0100" References: <3A6CF781.C9C2871A@yahoo.com> <20010123003756.A33892@hub.freebsd.org> <xzpu26qh61r.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20010123122056.A8416@cichlids.cichlids.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > Thus spake Dag-Erling Smorgrav (des@ofug.org): > > Alexander Langer <alex@FreeBSD.ORG> writes: > > > There recently (last week or something) was a thread here or on > > > another mailinglist on how to debug kernel moduls, which is a little > > > bit tricky. > > It's also documented in the handbook. > Well, actually debugging modules is a little bit more tricky than > debugging kernels with statically linked drivers. It's still documented in the handbook. I don't see where you find a contradiction here. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpk87mh5ll.fsf>