Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 05 Aug 1996 23:09:38 -0400
From:      "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@freebsd.org>
To:        Tony Kimball <alk@think.com>
Cc:        100626.3506@CompuServe.COM, dfr@render.com, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 100BASE-TX hubs 
Message-ID:  <18156.839300978@orion.webspan.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 05 Aug 1996 18:11:10 CDT." <199608052311.SAA26259@compound.Think.COM> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tony Kimball wrote in message ID
<199608052311.SAA26259@compound.Think.COM>:
> Most folks seem to have no problems using arbitrary vendor 100TX
> end-station and hub equipment, mix-n-match.

With good reason ... it's a standard that, for once, most people seem
to have been able to agree to follow :-) The only problems I've EVER
seen on a 100bTX net were to do with (poor) cabling.

Gary
--
Gary Palmer                                          FreeBSD Core Team Member
FreeBSD: Turning PC's into workstations. See http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/ for info



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?18156.839300978>