Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:08:47 -0400 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: geoffroy desvernay <dgeo@centrale-marseille.fr> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.3-RC3 Now Available Message-ID: <20140711170847.GQ25581@hub.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <53BFCF8D.7030600@centrale-marseille.fr> References: <20140706215453.GO1216@hub.FreeBSD.org> <53BE7215.5050009@centrale-marseille.fr> <20140710112041.GE25581@hub.FreeBSD.org> <53BE7FF0.1090204@centrale-marseille.fr> <20140710121836.GG25581@hub.FreeBSD.org> <53BFCF8D.7030600@centrale-marseille.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--l8yJEXo8J9fv7OFY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 01:50:37PM +0200, geoffroy desvernay wrote: > On 07/10/2014 14:18, Glen Barber wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 01:58:40PM +0200, geoffroy desvernay wrote: > >> On 07/10/2014 13:20, Glen Barber wrote: > >>> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:59:33PM +0200, geoffroy desvernay wrote: > >>>> On 07/06/2014 23:54, Glen Barber wrote: > >>>> After upgrading from 9.3-RC1, sshd refuses to launch with: > >>>> /usr/sbin/sshd: Undefined symbol "ssh_explicit_bzero" > >>>> > >>> > >>> I have just installed 9.3-RC1 in a VM, and have verified that > >>> ssh_explicit_bzero does exist in /usr/lib/private/libssh.so. > >>> > >>> What version were you running before upgrading to 9.3-RC1? > >>> > >>> Glen > >>> > >> 9.2-RELEASE-p7 > >> > >> I managed to get it working by tar -C/ -xvpf base.txz from 9.3-RC3 rel= ease > >> > >=20 > > I am not sure what happened in your case, but an upgrade from > > 9.2-RELEASE-p10 to 9.3-RC1 then to 9.3-RC3 also does not show this > > behavior. > >=20 > > Glen > >=20 (Sorry, just saw your reply now.) > So it's shurely an error of mine :( >=20 > Could an unfinished upgrade (eg: missing last 'install' after reboot) > lead to this situation ? I suppose it is possible, however sshd(8) is linked against /usr/lib/private/libssh.so, not /usr/lib/libssh.so after the userland bits are installed. > Could the next 'fetch' soft-fail indicating that there are uninstalled > updates ? >=20 Generally, no. freebsd-update does not really care what version you are running when upgrading, and would install any updates to the latest point anyway. > Here I clearly missed something, but couldn't freebsd-update catch this > between kernel install and userland to avoid future inconsistent upgrade ? >=20 In think it already does. But in this case, it would not matter because the ssh_explicit_bzero is a symbol in a userland shared library, not part of the kernel. > (This machine have been installed on 9.1 from binaries, and only > freebsd-update'ed since) >=20 Yes, this is why I tested the upgrade path from 9.2-RELEASE through 9.3-RC1 then to 9.3-RC3, in case there was an incompatibility somewhere earlier. Glen --l8yJEXo8J9fv7OFY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTwBofAAoJELls3eqvi17QS0UP/2/fawI4LA0GRcJW/Ky3zRwe H5hEEqYEPGP+34vJBpu9neR5aDSIQoKYmjJxP/SC1U3btw9pMIkLfIQ/UfwWjBUA DIN9jr/IIeZv1hP34XPdEv2uii3iTIuU4nVfaMRN9hOQH4jg9FrnURSlIfYb89y/ 8tFIz9E6859c+tMQJbjigLtTOLAcq+GugRJM5CLE54iNUdwXwh54TmpxHRH3CrnX nCCbgNo9nSv4pCJxRUizwiK5W7ADF/tOR94q2/Tx3MN6WNpPbf+kRbt3LBARoB++ 3rgdTae3v3QcNeGC6oPr295TcIh5AIGmHIluh69XeTHJ1iLJIgGu9xpvcnVw2G6q S54lFrmaqOa/h79Mt2K+JmQueDKaNgIF+goGpmmCf/7clM00OCrHYC9bGTDUNMCd cNqn88iRNqGZIbe956pGb91xBzuDtxdj7xg0wgen3kGUjRczWkizzrU6DsnqGU5r xLkMmrU8KZaqkAAOy+LkPFHgS4S2Fxm5q1so9doi8liLb+eUanVGWUZlcazL4JAS qykbm5bOslf/57XzksZ5W3SyYdRAyAMLlBJG+xfQIihMyXVmvVKB/AKV8ijQcyaC EogdaRomJ9B5eQbdM3m5zkgb9vVSS7UicTtkLl574p+Pb8YJBYZP8LA/doGxcVGZ KRDRhpukRMmX1SavNwG+ =9ARf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l8yJEXo8J9fv7OFY--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140711170847.GQ25581>