Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 21:57:41 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> Cc: Martin Blapp <mb@imp.ch>, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca> Subject: Re: dhclient sucks Message-ID: <20050728045741.GB7200@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <1185.172.16.0.199.1122526562.squirrel@172.16.0.1> References: <20050728004611.A41682@cvs.imp.ch> <20050727230415.GB7618@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <20050728014022.R41682@cvs.imp.ch> <20050727234436.GA15362@odin.ac.hmc.edu> <1185.172.16.0.199.1122526562.squirrel@172.16.0.1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 12:56:02AM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > On Wed, July 27, 2005 7:44 pm, Brooks Davis said: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2005 at 01:42:14AM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> > >>> If we can't get things under control soon, we can look at alternate > >>> options. IMO, using the port isn't really an option because it > >>> wouldn't allow users to install, but worst case reviving your version > >>> of the ISC code for 6.x might be feasiable. I'd really like to avoid > >>> that route though. > >> > >> Hmm, I don't know whats the best thing to do currently. But I think the > >> option to use the old version after installing would make all users > >> having problems happy (until they install a new box ;) > > > > Feel free to work up a patch. I'd much rather spend my time trying to > > solve the problems with the new code for the moment. >=20 > Why not work on the issues with the OpenBSD version of dhclient for now, > if no solutions are found to the current problems before release of 6.0, > then revert to ISC version for release, and keep the obsd version in > current? That's my plan. I think we'll be able to fix the OpenBSD client sufficently for 6.0, but should we fail, falling back to the ISC client for RELNG_6 is the most rational thing to do. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC6GXEXY6L6fI4GtQRAqqXAJ0dMepgf8f6ZqtdRck2jng/bPBpEACg2eUb 6sL0Hnr3wc98q0w2hd3cuEQ= =2Hyx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TakKZr9L6Hm6aLOc--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050728045741.GB7200>