Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 23:55:27 +0300 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru> To: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules Message-ID: <20010204235527.A45598@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20010204211845.B2179@cichlids.cichlids.com>; from alex@big.endian.de on Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 09:18:45PM %2B0100 References: <200101291905.f0TJ5BQ11914@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010201201304.A22498@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20010204002546.A27704@nagual.pp.ru> <20010204121115.A3246@cichlids.cichlids.com> <20010204230959.A42236@nagual.pp.ru> <20010204211845.B2179@cichlids.cichlids.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 21:18:45 +0100, Alexander Langer wrote: > > What's the difference, then? (between slave and full port) > > I know negative difference only - slave port assume building ispell > > itself. > > It keeps the dictionaries to the ispell port, where they belong. > There is no real advantage, but it _just_ would fit into the scheme > of the other dictionaries. I dislike this scheme in general - it adds unnecessary complexity. It is temporary acceptable for languages with no separate subdirectory in ports, but gains nothing for languages with separate subdirectory, like Russian. Moreover, ispell port comes with several embedded languages - this scheme is acceptable for them too. Russian is not embedded language in ispell distribution. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010204235527.A45598>