Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 22:08:19 +0200 From: "Spil Oss" <spil.oss@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: cvsup vs csup Message-ID: <5fbf03c20710131308o65e01b36pf46106e2b9b1ab77@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello all, http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/current-stable.html is referring to cvsup to update the source tree, whereas csup is currently the tool that comes out-of-the-box with a fresh freebsd install (as I found out with a fresh 6.2 install) Would it not be better to refer to the csup program and rename the http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvsup.html page to csup.html? Both the current-stable.html and cvsup.html refer to a program not the method. Alternatively one could argue that we should refer to the CVSup method for updating the sourcetree and subsequently make references to both cvsup and csup programs in the CVSup method page. I would be happy either way, but things seem a bit inconsistent currently. Kind regards, Spil.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5fbf03c20710131308o65e01b36pf46106e2b9b1ab77>