Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 08 Feb 2006 14:52:27 +0900
From:      gnn@FreeBSD.org
To:        James Juran <James.Juran@baesystems.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Zeroing wrong union member in in6_control()
Message-ID:  <m2pslyz9b8.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
In-Reply-To: <1139330290.13750.11.camel@juran.digitalnet.com>
References:  <1139330290.13750.11.camel@juran.digitalnet.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At Tue, 07 Feb 2006 11:38:09 -0500,
James Juran wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain (quoted-printable)>]
> In what looks like a copy&paste remnant from the preceding case, the
> wrong union member is used as the first argument to bzero in
> in6_control().  This doesn't cause an actual bug, but making this change
> would improve code clarity and robustness to change and also avoids a
> warning from a certain static analysis tool.
> 
> I'm not a regular FreeBSD contributor, so if this patch is worthwhile
> can someone please apply it?  If I should send things like this to a
> different mailing list in the future, please let me know.

The Kame list is still the best one for this (kame
<snap-users@kame.net>) but I've forwarded it for you.

I'll take care of getting this into FreeBSD though.

Thanks,
George



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2pslyz9b8.wl%gnn>