Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 13:05:36 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Patrick Bihan-Faou <patrick@mindstep.com> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of the netatalk stack Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912161304140.34717-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <00c501bf47ec$01fee840$040aa8c0@local.mindstep.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
the kernel code for appletalk is 'out of date' but it is also somewhat modified.. If you want to work with it, let me know and I can help as I did the original integration into our tree, Julian On Thu, 16 Dec 1999, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote: > Hi, > > > I was looking at the netatalk package and the appletalk support in the > kernel source code and I realized that they are based on the same code > originally (the code from netatalk). > > The kernel code however is quite out of date from what can be found in the > netatalk-asun package. I was wondering if anybody is planning on integrating > the latest changes ? If not is it something that I should undertake ? Are > there any major reasons why the code in freebsd should be left alone ? > > > PS. I cross-posted in current and stable because it affects both stream in > the same way, however I guess the discussion should be kept in "current", so > please try to reply to the correct address. Thanks. > > > > Patrick. > > -- > www.mindstep.com > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9912161304140.34717-100000>