Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:22:09 +0100 From: albi <albi@scii.nl> To: Jose Borquez <bsdlists@sbcglobal.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports vs Packages Message-ID: <20051213222209.a31b2d3f.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <439F3A4D.2060704@sbcglobal.net> References: <439F3A4D.2060704@sbcglobal.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 13:17:01 -0800 Jose Borquez <bsdlists@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > When installing the same software using either the ports or a > package do they both install in the same locations? For Example > installing Apache from ports on one server and installing Apache from > packages on another server would still use the same locations for > both? yes, afaik ports and packages both use /usr/local as prefix (the "makeworld base" however uses /usr as prefix) -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051213222209.a31b2d3f.albi>