Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 4 Aug 2004 17:15:39 +0300
From:      Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@online.fr>
Cc:        "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: man(1)
Message-ID:  <20040804141539.GB26281@ip.net.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20040804133938.GA3067@online.fr>
References:  <BAY8-F72aIQJxKgEmti001189bf@hotmail.com> <20040804042951.GA1371@online.fr> <20040804073012.GA685@arthur.nitro.dk> <20040804073532.GA22846@ip.net.ua> <20040804133938.GA3067@online.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 09:39:38AM -0400, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov said on Aug  4, 2004 at 10:35:32:
> > On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 09:30:12AM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> > > On 2004.08.04 00:29:51 -0400, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
> > > > I was wrong about calling it BSD man... it's GNU man, but a much ol=
der
> > > > version than what current linux systems ship.
> > > >
> > > > I can work on a patch for this specific feature when I get some tim=
e.
> > > > Before I start, is there any reason people may think this is a bad
> > > > idea?
> > >=20
> > > Well, it can be done without a patch... I use the following tcsh alias
> > > so I can just write 'manf foo.1' :
> > >=20
> > > groff -Wall -Tascii -te -mandoc !^ | less
> > >=20
> > You need to use ``-mtty-char -man'' to get the correct output.  (-man
> > or -mandoc doesn't matter.)
>=20
>=20
> Well that kinds of proves my point... you expect new users to know all
> this?   I myself have used something like "groff -Tascii -mandoc" but
> only after a few years of using unix.
>=20
No, I don't even expect new users to worry about formatting the
manpage source files like ``man /usr/src/bin/cat/cat.1''.  ;)

And someone could put this hint into the FreeBSD fortune file.

I'm not opposed to the idea of man(1) being able to work with
a pathname arguments, if the patch is small.


Cheers,
--=20
Ruslan Ermilov
ru@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer

--NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFBEO+LqRfpzJluFF4RAovPAJ9VzoaZohDSN8fnP9Tgo12fGC6VjQCeJJIB
GNFo8W6qTLK4nkF0j394c/s=
=vXmE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NDin8bjvE/0mNLFQ--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040804141539.GB26281>