Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2000 01:13:09 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: "Chris D. Faulhaber" <jedgar@fxp.org> Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shells Message-ID: <20000417011309.B3064@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.10004152012310.82283-100000@pawn.primelocation.net>; from jedgar@fxp.org on Sat, Apr 15, 2000 at 08:13:31PM -0400 References: <200004152356.e3FNup102274@cwsys.cwsent.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10004152012310.82283-100000@pawn.primelocation.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 15, 2000 at 08:13:31PM -0400, Chris D. Faulhaber wrote: > If you were to replace /bin/sh, why not follow OpenBSD's (NetBSD's?) lead > and import pdksh...getting sh and ksh at once? Because I could just import the *REAL* Ksh (ksh93) instead. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000417011309.B3064>