Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Oct 1997 01:43:17 -0700
From:      Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc:        Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, jbryant@tfs.net, dkelly@HiWAAY.net, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: C2 Trusted FreeBSD? 
Message-ID:  <199710140843.BAA03517@rah.star-gate.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:46:56 PDT." <21477.876815216@time.cdrom.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From The Desk Of "Jordan K. Hubbard" :
> > This is the same government that thought that hiding a fair-weather 
> > aircraft for 25 years was a worthwhile investment of the taxpayers 
> > money?
> 
> Whoa!  Is someone slamming the F117 here?  Fightin' words!
> 
> Whatever shortcomings the F117 may have in the frailty of its skin
> coating are more than offset by its ability to go after radar sites
> and down SAM corridors after highly defended targets.  It sure beats
> the old days when you sent a couple of B52 "cells" (3 bombers) in
> after the same target and were't too surprised if you lost a couple of
> aircraft in the process.
> 
> Now the B2, on the other hand - that may indeed be a bomber who's
> primary mission no longer justifies its cost.  Better to do today's
                                                               ^^^^^^
It took a whole lot of effort and money to get to the point in which
is no longer warranted to develop sophisticated weapons to defeat the
enemy . It was a war on the management of economy  which have paid dearly for
however we are now free to discuss these issues 8)

	Cheers,
	Amancio
	






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710140843.BAA03517>