Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 15:48:06 -0700 From: Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> To: "Robert F. Ross" <rross@recourse.com> Cc: Jan Grant <Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk>, freebsd-java@freebsd.org, Bill Huey <billh@gnuppy.monkey.org> Subject: Re: green vs. native threads Message-ID: <20020606224806.GA3049@gnuppy.monkey.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0206061543110.1002-100000@recourse.com> References: <20020606221014.GA2514@gnuppy.monkey.org> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0206061543110.1002-100000@recourse.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 03:44:51PM -0700, Robert F. Ross wrote: > Ah. The process appears to actually function and do everything it's > supposed to, so I don't think it's the SIGSEGV issue (I'm still not sure > what the libc_r signal debugging stuff is, I don't debug stuff on freebsd > often). The most likely thing from the replies I've seen is that the > pthread library is busywaiting during select() or something. It does > everything it's supposed to but tends to burn 100% cpu even when it > shouldn't need to. How many threads are you running ? I can't think of anything in libc_r that would suck so much CPU time other than it bogging down from trying to manage a zillion threads. bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020606224806.GA3049>