Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 03:44:52 -0500 From: Nikolas Britton <nikolas.britton@gmail.com> To: Graham Bentley <gbentley@uk2.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 100Mbit network performance - again (Andrew P.) Message-ID: <ef10de9a050727014436bd1cd9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50914.81.174.174.115.1122449473.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com> References: <20050727043609.DF53E16A42F@hub.freebsd.org> <50914.81.174.174.115.1122449473.squirrel@maxproxy1.uk2net.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/27/05, Graham Bentley <gbentley@uk2.net> wrote: > > "mistakes" must be on the Windows side, but that's > > not an excuse for FreeBSD/Linux to not be at least > > 99%-Windows-networking-compatible. >=20 > Tridge Quote: Samba is Bug for Bug compatible > with Windows. >=20 > (Until M$ changes something ie tries to fix its own bugs > and makes some others OR are new 'features' introduced > deliberately ???) >=20 > Any advice on tuning up TCP / IDE Disk IO / Samba on 5.4 > would be interesting !!! >=20 I wish you could run Netware on top of BSD... I think Novell made a very smart move adopting Linux into it's portfolio.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef10de9a050727014436bd1cd9>