Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Apr 2019 20:49:56 -0700
From:      Frank Fenderbender <frankfenderbender@council124.org>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   question re: your system's primary use?
Message-ID:  <6D66F411-647A-4CE3-87CD-B837B6D2F43D@council124.org>
In-Reply-To: <1446C6EE-3DD7-4311-98F2-97250D4702EE@council124.org>
References:  <CANx7MpfDQJEUsjo_SSYqnExagj30NAAD8cPYiR3mDZq_ztor8Q@mail.gmail.com> <43760917-5FAA-4C75-A4D2-923A5EA0E624@council124.org> <2d7ff5f5-603f-004d-31fc-14eef658997e@holgerdanske.com> <162715a2-dc44-0555-29b9-50ca75af46e6@kicp.uchicago.edu> <85694074-E3B1-4AC3-A742-FEB8BD4BA9B0@council124.org> <1446C6EE-3DD7-4311-98F2-97250D4702EE@council124.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Prefatory note to question (skippable)

	I am trying to assess, w/o much success, on whether development =
on and verification for=20
	FreeBSD for software  applications is realistic.
	I realize that the 'questions' list is primarily for solving =
install and configuration bumps,=20
	however, I trust the wealth of experience of its membership.
	If I can tally the ways to which the platform is being used, =
perhaps I can predict better how my time=20
	would be spent in terms of configuring, tweaking, fixing, =
ratio'ed with time spent developing and testing=20
	cross-platform/platform-independent code sets."
	My first engineering job was in 1989 at Tektronix, where we =
worked on the Standard Tektronix Interface (STI)=20
	layered above the graphics engine on Tek workstations (613x; =
43xx XD88) based in Motorola 68020/88000=20
	chipsets beneath the UTek operating system, which was the =
Tektronix on-board hybrid-UNIX supporting=20
	both 4.2BSD and System V commands.
	I was verifying that STI's Fortran-callable C and C-callable =
Fortran code had identical results. In a way,=20
	this use is similar to what I would be using a BSD system for =
today.
	We used stistdio.c and stistdio.f as places where the varying =
Unix ioctl commands (and equivalents)=20
	could be set by customers using unsupported platforms.
	Many, if not most list users' questions seem specific to build, =
dependency, bug or omission workarounds,=20
	special-case installs, and/or conflictive add-on settings, the =
actual usage is a bit obscured or oft-unmentioned=20
	w/r/t the question(s)/answer(s).
	So, for my "question" can you just check what use your system =
has for you?
	I hope to ascertain whether anyone exists is using it as I hope =
to, and that will tell me if I will have commonality=20
	within a list sub-group? If you can suggest another list or =
forum, which exists for using FreeBSD desktop as=20
	a development-test environment, I would be very grateful.

Question
	Do you use your FreeBSD system as:
	[   ]	server
	[   ]	firewall
	[   ]	development-test environment
	[   ]	daily desktop (email/browser)
	[   ]	other (rough detail?)

Thanks,
"frank"
frankfenderbender@council124.org








Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6D66F411-647A-4CE3-87CD-B837B6D2F43D>