Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 7 Apr 2001 13:52:24 -0500
From:      Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>
To:        Dinesh Nair <dinesh@alphaque.com>
Cc:        The Babbler <bts@babbleon.org>, Rasputin <rara.rasputin@virgin.net>, stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Disklabel 101?
Message-ID:  <15055.25064.543389.828877@guru.mired.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104072349270.2691-100000@prophet.alphaque.com>
References:  <15054.57979.84674.462609@guru.mired.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0104072349270.2691-100000@prophet.alphaque.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dinesh Nair <dinesh@alphaque.com> types:
> 
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Mike Meyer wrote:
> 
> > you please. I.e. - you don't need swap at all, and I've got one system
> > that has swap on a different slice than it's root file system.
> 
> for performance reasons, that's wise.

If they were on different disks, that's certainly true. I'm not sure
if it makes much difference on the same disk, though.  With two disk I
use one swap on each so the system can stripe them.

This one is a test system; I'm running two versions of FreeBSD on
it. They both use the same swap so I don't have to allocate swap for
both.

	<mike
--
Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>			http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15055.25064.543389.828877>