Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 15:23:49 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@freebsd.org> To: chad@DCFinc.com Cc: lamont@scriptkiddie.org, a.l.meyers@consult-meyers.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is "stable" "stable"? Message-ID: <20010721152349S.jkh@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20010721144206.E19014@freeway.dcfinc.com> References: <20010721182504.L857-100000@nomad.consult-meyers.com> <20010721111339.B75328-100000@coredump.scriptkiddie.org> <20010721144206.E19014@freeway.dcfinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> Subject: Re: is "stable" "stable"? Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2001 14:42:06 -0700 > Why is it so difficult for people to understand that calling the > head of a development branch "-stable" is just going to invite > problems? Let's not start THAT thread again either - this is sort of like trying to quench a fire by throwing kerasine on it! We established that renaming -stable would be a lot of work and nobody volunteered for flag day duty. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010721152349S.jkh>