Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Feb 2001 21:43:12 +0100
From:      sthaug@nethelp.no
To:        scanner@jurai.net
Cc:        marcr@closed-networks.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: /etc/rc.firewall fixes
Message-ID:  <67798.983133792@verdi.nethelp.no>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 25 Feb 2001 15:33:28 -0500 (EST)"
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102251529170.66378-100000@sasami.jurai.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 	And UDP is stateless. I would be itnerested to know how you filter
> state with UDP. ;)

You punch a hole in the firewall for the port(s) in question and for a
limited amount of time (say 30 seconds). Useful to allow for instance
DNS queries from clients on the inside.

Yes, of course you are somewhat vulnerable while you have this hole in
the firewall. However, it's probably better than having everything wide
open, while also being more *useful* than having all UDP closed.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?67798.983133792>