Date: 03 Sep 2002 18:50:19 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/mozilla Makefile distinfo pkg-plist ports/www/mozilla/files mozilla.sh patch-Makefile.in patch-embedding::config::basebrowser-unix patch-modules::libpref::src::unix::unix.js patch-nsFontMetricsGTK.cpp patch-nsFontMetricsXlib.cpp patch-security::coreconf::FreeBSD.mk ports/www/mozilla-devel ... Message-ID: <1031093420.330.32.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <20020903213738.GA88020@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200209032045.g83Kjx1m089666@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020903213738.GA88020@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 2002-09-03 at 17:37, David O'Brien wrote: > On Tue, Sep 03, 2002 at 01:45:59PM -0700, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > Log: > > Add mozilla-*-devel after a repo copy from mozilla. > > I thought we were going to use names like "foo-snapshot" to remove the > ambiguity if "devel" is an in-development port, or one used for > development. Hmmm...sorry, I wasn't aware. I discussed this with Maxim, and he didn't object to either mozilla-devel or mozilla10/mozilla11. I went with the -devel name because the mozilla.org site implied that 1.1 was still bleeding edge. I'm open to any naming scheme that avoids confusion. However, I do believe we need both versions in the tree for right now. Joe > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1031093420.330.32.camel>