Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 19:43:25 -0400 From: matt donovan <kitchetech@gmail.com> To: Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: screen and tmux should be listed under the same category Message-ID: <28283d910905171643n991c64bjb67cf3371aefe27@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <b269bc570905162337v6d2fee16o75a68d5eb7ba7b59@mail.gmail.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0905161134510.50084@FGD135.localdomain> <4A0F35C7.7060703@p6m7g8.com> <28283d910905161638w5f7e5f54gcd16ef29f0f0b0b6@mail.gmail.com> <b269bc570905162337v6d2fee16o75a68d5eb7ba7b59@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM, matt donovan <kitchetech@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci < > pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>wrote: > > > >> Josh Rickmar wrote: > >> > GNU screen is listed under sysutils, while tmux is listed under misc. > >> > Shouldn't the two at least be in the same category, since they both do > >> > the exact same thing? (tmux is even designed to be a BSD-licensed > >> > replacement for screen.) > >> > > >> Does anyone have any thoughts on tmux vs screen ? the NO_PACKAGE in > >> screen has been annoying me for years now if I can find a good > >> replacement I'm so there. > >> > > tmux does not work inside the shell due to sc. But in X it works > wonders. > > tmux works just fine at a console without X running. > > > hmm odd since last time I asked about it it did not since I m the one that brought it up, since I had an error and was told that the sc does not support that feature what freebsd are you running since I tired it in 7.x.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28283d910905171643n991c64bjb67cf3371aefe27>