Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:22:42 -0700 From: James Gritton <jamie@gritton.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD virtualization mailing list <freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: where are we? Message-ID: <491E3272.6080104@gritton.org> In-Reply-To: <20081114231011.GA4847@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <491DC5BF.1060004@elischer.org> <491DEBF7.5070909@gritton.org> <20081114231011.GA4847@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 02:21:59PM -0700, James Gritton wrote: > >> Julian Elischer wrote: >> >>> I'm just coming up for air.. where are we? >>> >>> what's teh next commit? >>> >>> Marko, how close is commit2/... to where you want it to get to? >>> >> I can say for myself that the new jail framework is ready to go just >> as soon as the final vimage bits appear. Or before then, if there's >> reason to believe that's not going to happen very soon. I've been >> kind of treading water, merging changes as I see them, with a vimage- >> ready version and one tracking current. >> > > I'm about to commit the new ZFS, which also changes some jail bits, like > prison services, etc. Would this interfer with your work? > It will a bit. Your OSD interface doesn't have callbacks. While you must have made ZFS not need them, I moved the other direction, adding callbacks for the jail_set and jail_get system calls, as well as the create and destroy callbacks that exist currently. This isn't a problem, as long as you don't mind me keeping the prison services interface around, or re-introducing it. The other alternative would be to add some generic callback capability to OSD, but I haven't given that any thought yet. Other than that, I don't think ZFS changes should affect anything that's not easily handled. - Jamie
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?491E3272.6080104>