Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:19:00 +0200 From: Valentin Nechayev <netch@ivb.nn.kiev.ua> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/egcs/files patch-cp%decl.c patch-cp%ptree.c patch-cp::decl.c patch-cp::ptree.c patch-libiberty%Makefile.in patch-libiberty::Makefile.in ports/mail/exim-old/files patch-src%smtp_in.c patch-src::smtp_in.c ports/sysutils/e2fsprogs/files patch-intl%Makefile.in ... Message-ID: <20040321171900.GA3001@iv.nn.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20040218232055.GC61242@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200402181107.i1IB7DKX058037@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040218210517.GA58627@dragon.nuxi.com> <xzplln0qej7.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20040218232055.GC61242@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> DON'T use '::' either! It causes problems with Bash. >> You seem to be the only one to consider that a problem. Maybe you >> should try to solve it at your end rather than attempt to impose your >> will on the rest of the community? DOB> We have alot more Bash users than users trying to put /usr/ports into DOB> Perforce. The 0.1% using Perforce can simply escape the %'s. I'm bash user (I'm too lazy to switch to zsh;))), but see no problems with `::' But if one needs shell-safe infix, <mode=bikeshed> `--' is good. </mode> -netch-
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040321171900.GA3001>