Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:07:52 -0700
From:      Learner Study <learner.study@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Cc:        learner.study@gmail.com
Subject:   TCP SACK
Message-ID:  <7efa8a7d0907210207m327a1252nee4a04f5e4ea7a@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello experts:

Is there is reason why freebsd TCP implementation limits the number of SACK
blocks on receiver side to MAX_SACK_BLOCKS whereas the sender side SACK
holes are implemented as a linked list?

Any issues if someone decides to use receiver side linked list as well
(instead of fixed sized array)?

Thanks in advance for your suggestions.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7efa8a7d0907210207m327a1252nee4a04f5e4ea7a>