Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 11:49:47 -0500 From: "illoai@gmail.com" <illoai@gmail.com> To: Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nomenclature for conf files Message-ID: <CAHHBGkr12rEqeAKwZk4kjza%2B5vo71CvR1bBegP6A730jpnWAiQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121112051229.GA1235@mycenae.sbb.rs> References: <20121112051229.GA1235@mycenae.sbb.rs>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12 November 2012 00:12, Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> wrote: > It might sound stupid, but I'd like to know if there's > any difference. Are those 3 line the same? > > WITH_KMS=YES > WITH_KMS="YES" > WITH_KMS=yes > > Best regards In /etc/make.conf it shouldn't matter: they should all be treated as synonyms for: WITH_KMS= -- --
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHHBGkr12rEqeAKwZk4kjza%2B5vo71CvR1bBegP6A730jpnWAiQ>