Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Aug 1999 10:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
To:        Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com>
Cc:        Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB for Linuxulator variables 
Message-ID:  <199908161726.KAA10553@apollo.backplane.com>
References:   <Pine.BSF.4.05.9908161921530.34377-100000@freja.webgiro.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
:Yeah... Then, the next in line after "linux" are: ibcs2 and svr4 and
:whatever comes next. Can you live with them as main sysctl categories?
:
:Andrzej Bialecki

    I think Solaris has a chance, but I doubt any other traditional vendor
    UNIXes do.  So it comes down to Solaris and Linux for the most part.

					-Matt
					Matthew Dillon 
					<dillon@backplane.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908161726.KAA10553>