Date: 24 Apr 2000 02:43:28 +0200 From: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>, attila <attila@hun.org>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: __func__ not declared for kernel build (5.0-CURRENT) Message-ID: <5lsnwcqqfj.fsf@assaris.sics.se> In-Reply-To: Matthew Dillon's message of "Sun, 23 Apr 2000 10:30:20 -0700 (PDT)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004232323020.2928-100000@alphplex.bde.org> <200004231730.KAA62311@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> writes: > obviously missing __FUNCTION__ was added by GCC many years ago, but it was > a while before it's use in defines in header (.h) files was dealt with > properly. You mean outside a function? What's the proper way of dealing with that? > I wish these stupid standards committees would just choose > something that people are already using rather then make up new names! The problem is that __func__ and __FUNCTION__ are not the same thing. And thus it makes sense for them not the use same name. /assar To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5lsnwcqqfj.fsf>