Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:06:29 -0400 From: APseudoUtopia <apseudoutopia@gmail.com> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Kalle_M=C3=B8ller?= <freebsd-questions@k-moeller.dk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portsnap vs CSup Message-ID: <27ade5280903191206u45c2d11p3c28047b93f06447@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com> References: <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Kalle M=C3=B8ller <freebsd-questions@k-moeller.dk> wrote: > Hi > > I've been digging around, but I can't find a clear answer, which of those > two is the "correct" to use. Hence I don't use one now, so if I'm going t= o > learn one, I would prefer it to be the right one. > > -- > /km I'm sure they're both "correct." I used to use csup (because that was what I learned first - no real reason). Then I switched to portsnap because I read that it has a secure key system to verify the integrity of the download.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?27ade5280903191206u45c2d11p3c28047b93f06447>