Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:20:11 +0100
From:      Torfinn Ingolfsen <tingox@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Bernhard Froehlich <decke@bluelife.at>, multimedia@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: p5-xmltv - old?
Message-ID:  <ef8c8a880911160920v229c53bcwa5728b547a512b0f@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f94ed96d0e270a0bf2c5a4a0a25977bf.squirrel@webmail.itac.at>
References:  <ef8c8a880911141524t4d1939cye6b2635ec4df82ca@mail.gmail.com> <8918c1a2037dab2e41e092833e042f39.squirrel@webmail.itac.at> <ef8c8a880911150927i65ed7b99yc5ac9d7fd5b5b187@mail.gmail.com> <f94ed96d0e270a0bf2c5a4a0a25977bf.squirrel@webmail.itac.at>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,

On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Bernhard Froehlich <decke@bluelife.at>wrote:

> Builds fine in my 7-stable/i386 tinderbox. I've checked which ports are
> depending on p5-xmltv [1] and checked if that update could affect them.
>
> deskutils/ontv: NOTOK using tv_grab_be
> misc/freeguide: OK using tv_cat
> multimedia/freevo: OK using tv_cat
> multimedia/mythtv: OK using tv_check
> multimedia/tv_grab_au: OK using tv_check
>
> The only one that definitely needs fixing is ontv. The others look good.
>

And that one (ontv) has gnome@ as the maintainer.
How should this be handled; should I send a mail to the gnome list first,
before sending in the PR?
Or should I just send the PR and then send a mail telling them that the ontv
port will / might be affected?


-- 
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ef8c8a880911160920v229c53bcwa5728b547a512b0f>