Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 13:36:16 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: nate@yogotech.com, fscked@pacbell.net, freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Trivial hack for pccardd(8) Message-ID: <15855.47296.802699.36156@emerger.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <20021205.132955.52623271.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <3DED9042.A7A6B6C3@pacbell.net> <20021205.101009.22498891.imp@bsdimp.com> <15855.40804.722314.647829@emerger.yogotech.com> <20021205.132955.52623271.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> : > What's wrong with pccardd_flags=-z? > : > : Any way that these could become the default flags in -stable? I asked > : before, but you said it was too close to a release (4.6R at the time). > > I don't think it would be a good idea to change this default in > -stable. If we did, would we get more complaints from people whose > boot time suddely was much larger? I think so. The extra 2-3 seconds increase in boot-time has happened *so* many times over the lifetime of 4.x branch that I doubt anyone would notice it for adding -z. My 486/66 running 2.1.5++ boots *way* faster than my 1.8Ghz P4 running 4.7-stable in the portions that FreeBSD is responsible for. :( Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15855.47296.802699.36156>