Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:31:32 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> Cc: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steveo@eircom.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /etc/shells #include syntax support patch Message-ID: <200101291631.LAA34977@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20010128190227.B25222@spawn.nectar.com> References: <20010128101349.2c94539f.steveo@eircom.net> <20010128190227.B25222@spawn.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:02:27 -0600, "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> said: > I would rather that a separate configuration file be read, for example, > with a list of shells(5) format files to consult. I would rather have a single file, located in a directory intended for configuration files. Perhaps we could call it ``/etc/shells'' which seems to be popular. There is no inherent virtue in having (some subset of) configuration files on every partition. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101291631.LAA34977>