Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 20 Dec 1999 16:14:33 -0600 (CST)
From:      "Jeffrey J. Libman" <jeffrl@wantabe.com>
To:        Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: mountd and rpc.statd won't run 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.9912201612350.88340-100000@cutter.wantabe.com>
In-Reply-To: <199912202157.NAA00717@mass.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
actually...my apologies to all! the issue has been resolved. 

somehow, the 'portmap_program' item in /etc/defaults/rc.conf for this
system was removed! thus, portmap was not running, and rpc.statd could not
register.

*sigh*

my apologies for the wasted time/effort/bandwidth...though this has
spawned some interesting, if questionable discussioins about virtual
hosting.

cheers,
jeff

--
                                |
                                |\            +------------------------------+
Jeffrey J. Libman, ops. mgr.    | \           |  Wantabe Internet Services   |
Wantabe, Inc.                   |__\          +------------------------------+
jeffrl@wantabe.com        <-----|------>      | access web cgi ftp news mail |
(281) 493-0718       __,.-=\'`^`'~=-../__,.-= +------------------------------+

On Mon, 20 Dec 1999, Mike Smith wrote:

> > 
> > after moving 54 virtual hosts to this machine, rpc.statd will not run: it
> > hangs; mountd runs (-r or not -r), but will not serve up mounts and dies.
> 
> Sounds like you may have DNS issues with one or more of the virtual IPs. 
> 
> > 2) configure the loopback interface properly. (i assign all virtual ip's
> > to the lo0 interface).
> 
> That's actually not really a good idea.  Bind them to the interface that 
> they'll be communicating on; that way you don't need to route them.
> 
> > 	b) it has been claimed that the virtual ip's need netmask
> > 	0xffffffff rather than 0xffffff00. i have tried it both ways.
> 
> That's also not correct.  The virtual addresses need to be configured 
> _correctly_, where all the normal rules regarding netmask overlap are 
> followed.
> 
> ie.  if you have three 'virtual' addresses 10.0.0.1, 10.0.0.2 and 
> 10.0.0.3, you would add them as:
> 
> 10.0.0.1 / 255.0.0.0
> 10.0.0.2 / 255.255.255.255
> 10.0.0.3 / 255.255.255.255
> 
> In other words, you add an aliased address with the correct netmask, 
> unless it overlaps a network previously established by another address, 
> in which case you add it with an all-ones netmask.
> 
> This is the way it's always worked on FreeBSD.
> 
> 
> -- 
> \\ Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. \\  Mike Smith
> \\ Tell him he should learn how to fish himself,  \\  msmith@freebsd.org
> \\ and he'll hate you for a lifetime.             \\  msmith@cdrom.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.9912201612350.88340-100000>