Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 15:58:54 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7-STABLE NFS: fatal: "select lock: Permission denied" Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1104041554100.55888@hub.org> In-Reply-To: <0F56F33B-C492-4723-B7EC-713AD64E856C@mac.com> References: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1104030135160.55888@hub.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1104041508000.55888@hub.org> <0F56F33B-C492-4723-B7EC-713AD64E856C@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:09 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> 'k, based on someone else's recommendation, I add 'nolockd' to the mount entry,a nd postfix now appears to work ... since I can safely guarantee that only the one host will have access to these files, that doesn't pose a porblem for me, but still find it a weird issue all things considered :( > > Be careful; multiple access from different processes even on a single > host can still run into locking issues against NFS filesystems, or data > corruption if locking isn't available. You're most at risk with local > delivery to an mbox-style INBOX; delivery to maildir-style INBOX is much > safer even on NFS without locking. In my case, I have postfix+cyrus-imapd ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Hosting Solutions S.A. scrappy@hub.org http://www.hub.org Yahoo:yscrappy Skype: hub.org ICQ:7615664 MSN:scrappy@hub.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1104041554100.55888>