Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:38:15 +0200 From: Christophe Yayon <lists@nbux.com> To: Alexey Vesnin <avesnin@mirknigi.ru> Cc: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nagios and freebsd threads issue : help please ... Message-ID: <430964C7.8060103@nbux.com> In-Reply-To: <004301c5a6d5$811662e0$260210ac@win> References: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0508191502380.12955-100000@sea.ntplx.net> <004301c5a6d5$811662e0$260210ac@win>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you very much Alexey for your help ! Just a little last question, how could i say to nagios to use it ? Do i need to recompile it (i suppose) but is there a configure param or a Makefile modification ? Sorry but i am not a developper... Thanks. Alexey Vesnin wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Daniel Eischen" <deischen@freebsd.org> > To: "Christophe Yayon" <lists@nbux.com> > Cc: <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> > Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 11:03 PM > Subject: Re: nagios and freebsd threads issue : help please ... > > > >>On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Christophe Yayon wrote: >> >> >>>Hi all >>> >>>You should know about freebsd and nagios 2.0b threads issues (100% cpu >>>use by a forked process, lost check result, some pause of nagios main >>>process in certains obscursives conditions...). >>> >>>Some Nagios developpers says that the problem is in FreeBSD and some >>>other says that the problem is in nagios pthreads implementation, here a >>>resume of our discussions : >> >>See > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=340959+344806+/usr/local/www/db/ > text/2005/freebsd-hackers/20050703.freebsd-hackers > >>-- >>DE >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > This is a common problem with more common salvation : use ports/devel/pth > library. It will solve this problem COMPLETELY AT ALL. I'm currently running > FreeBSD-4-STABLE build, upgradin' my kernel weekly and has no sign of such a > problem. Always remember the main benefit of OpenSource - source is just a > subject to work with... You may use defaults and they must work, but there's > no guarantee that this will work fine and 100%-fast for YOUR > hardware/software environment. Don't be shy to make modifications - > developers aren't the ones who must do all the job for you. It's up toy you > personally. > > Post Scriptum. 5.4 is not GOOD. It must be used ONLY if you don't have > another way. It's memory leak is horrible.... > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?430964C7.8060103>