Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:12:30 -0500 From: Neal Hogan <nealhogan@gmail.com> To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kalle_M=F8ller?= <freebsd-questions@k-moeller.dk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portsnap vs CSup Message-ID: <ab7b49bc0903191212q823b213g2396f61a6f398d8d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com> References: <8250ac3f0903191139m7c895ff9gde584ad16e3923f0@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Kalle M=F8ller < freebsd-questions@k-moeller.dk> wrote: > Hi > > I've been digging around, but I can't find a clear answer, which of those > two is the "correct" to use. Hence I don't use one now, so if I'm going t= o > learn one, I would prefer it to be the right one. > > -- > /km > I don't think its a matter of right/wrong or good/bad. I recently used portsnap and it did a fine (dare I say 'snappy') job. Also, there's not much to learn with regard to portsnap. I can't talk about CVSup, although it doesn't look too complicated. So, if you find in unappealing, you could easily try CVSup without have wasted much time with portsnap. -Neal _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > --=20 www.nealhogan.net www.lambdaserver.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ab7b49bc0903191212q823b213g2396f61a6f398d8d>