Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 15:15:45 -0400 (EDT) From: Cliff Addy <fbsdlist@federation.addy.com> To: Brett Taylor <brett@peloton.physics.montana.edu> Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Port vs package logic Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980812151231.9900B-100000@federation.addy.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980812112341.19027C-100000@peloton.physics.montana.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Brett Taylor wrote: >> packages installable from sysinstall vs the ports tree? For example, I >> noticed during the install of 2.2.7 that tcsh is no longer installable >> from sysinstall's "Packages" option, you must install it using make in >> the ports tree. > > What? I just installed 2.2.7 when it came out and I installed tcsh FROM > the packages. Getting on that machine and running /stand/sysinstall and > doing a post-configure, add packages, I find tcsh sitting right there in > shells right where it's supposed to be. Truly bizarre, when I run sysinstall, select "Configure" then "Packages" then "CDROM" then "shells", the only thing listed is "bash-2.02", nothing else. I also checked in "All" and it's not listed there, either. Perhaps Walnut Creek actually sent me a 2.2.6.9999999 CD? :) Cliff To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.980812151231.9900B-100000>