Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 09:04:28 -0800 From: Carl Johnson <carlj@peak.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update - 10.0 to 10.1 Message-ID: <877fytwyg3.fsf@elk.localnet> In-Reply-To: <201411171626.05487.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> (Mark Tinka's message of "Mon, 17 Nov 2014 16:26:05 %2B0200") References: <201411170840.06373.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> <201411171550.10873.mark.tinka@seacom.mu> <001301d0026f$878bdce0$96a396a0$@seibercom.net> <201411171626.05487.mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> writes: > On Monday, November 17, 2014 04:05:22 PM Jerry wrote: > >> I received the same message. I decided to go ahead and do >> a complete rebuild of the ports. The message also stated >> that I should run "freebsd-update install" after >> rebuilding the ports. I assume I do that before >> rebooting the machine. Is that correct? I am also >> assuming that I should rebuild the ports BEFORE >> rebooting. I hope so. Because that is what I am doing >> and there was no message that stated I should reboot >> first. > > When upgrading between major versions, yes, you certainly > need to rebuild all userland ports before doing the second > reboot, otherwise all hell will break loose when libraries > for the major version are incompatibile with userland ports > built with a library from a previous major version. > > My issue is I've never had to do this when upgrading minor > revisions within the same release train. > > So I'll go ahead and ignore the message and let you all know > what happens. I ignored the message and I haven't seen any problems yet. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?877fytwyg3.fsf>