Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 Aug 2007 10:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" <danm@prime.gushi.org>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Building UNSTRIPPED binaries in ports?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.0.999.0708221042400.84024@qbhto.arg>
In-Reply-To: <20070821135923.Q64507@prime.gushi.org>
References:  <20070821135923.Q64507@prime.gushi.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I am encountering a bug with named-9.4.1-P1 that I am attempting to work with 
> ISC on, that I have built from ports (dns/bind94).

That's great, every little bit helps. :) You might also be interested to 
know that they have a new beta out for 9.4.2. 
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.4.2b1/bind-9.4.2b1.tar.gz
You should probably download that and take a look at the changelog to see 
if your issues are covered.

> However, I need a non-stripped version of the binary to get a backtrace. 
> I can't "roll my own" binary because it may be related to some way that 
> the port is built so I need to maintain a similar build environment.

I purposely do not do anything exotic with the port, so I doubt that's 
related. However, you can easily replicate the port's build environment by 
doing 'make config ; make -V CONFIGURE_ARGS' then running configure with 
that output and building it yourself.

Of course, the advice you got on WITH_DEBUG is also good if you want to 
use the port anyway.


hth,

Doug

-- 

     This .signature sanitized for your protection




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.0.999.0708221042400.84024>