Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:35:33 +0000 From: Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> To: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> Cc: vd@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/devel/pth failes to compile (conflict with /usr/include/signal.h) Message-ID: <20090325163533.776f1b68@gluon.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <20090325141956.GA11761@rebelion.Sisis.de> References: <20090325092840.GA3841@rebelion.Sisis.de> <20090325140908.GA14343@muon.cran.org.uk> <20090325141956.GA11761@rebelion.Sisis.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:19:56 +0100 Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote: > El d=EDa Wednesday, March 25, 2009 a las 02:09:09PM +0000, Bruce Cran > escribi=F3: >=20 > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:28:40AM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > # cd /usr/ports/devel/pth > > > vm-naranja# cvs up > > > cvs update: Updating . > > > cvs update: Updating files > > >=20 > ... > > > > >=20 > > See ports/132828 and > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head/2009-March/004946.html >=20 > Forgive me if this is a stupid questions (I'm new to CURRENT); I did a > cvs checkout of src and ports on March 23 and a cvs update of the port > today, why I don't have this fix? Is CVS not uptodate? >=20 The thread on svn-src-head is about the original change to signal.h which broke pth. --=20 Bruce Cran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090325163533.776f1b68>