Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 15:50:22 GMT From: Vasil Dimov <vd@datamax.bg> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/82527: New port: databases/pgmemcache Provides a PostgreSQL interface to memcached Message-ID: <200506221550.j5MFoMSs077275@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/82527; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Vasil Dimov <vd@datamax.bg>
To: Jacques Marneweck <jacques@powertrip.co.za>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/82527: New port: databases/pgmemcache Provides a PostgreSQL interface to memcached
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 18:42:09 +0300
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 03:11:35AM +1200, Jacques Marneweck wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 05:48:40PM +0300, Vasil Dimov wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 02:25:07PM +0000, Jacques Marneweck wrote:
> > >
> > ...
> > > XRUN_DEPENDS= memcached:${PORTSDIR}/databases/memcached
> > ...
> >
> > Why does it have memcache daemon as a run dependency? As I understand it
> > many memcache daemons are running on many remote machines with a lot
> > of free memory on each and postgresql server is using this memory with
> > libmemcache client library, right?
>
> Actually it's optional coming to think about it. Currently I'm running
> memcached on the development servers which also host postgresql and various
> other bits and pieces. Would you like me to resubmit the patch minus the
> RUN_DEPENDS?
Yes, if this port can run without memcached being installed on
the current machine, then it shouldn't be listed in RUN_DEPENDS=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFCuYbRFw6SP/bBpCARAoP+AJsE61ru108somMIYIlFGzvWFgFpWwCfbGea
gKPNC6LdAmV0ekK5A4rk4r0=
=aSOp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506221550.j5MFoMSs077275>