Date: Sat, 20 Jul 1996 08:20:09 -0500 (CDT) From: Alex Nash <nash@mcs.net> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Brett_Glass@ccgate.infoworld.com, alex@fa.tdktca.com, E00114@vnet.atea.be, bde@zeta.org.au, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple COM ports with same IRQ Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.91.960720081526.29121A-100000@Venus.mcs.com> In-Reply-To: <199607201148.VAA29911@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 20 Jul 1996, Bruce Evans wrote: > IIRC, the original poster only wanted to know about EISA systems with > ISA devices and the question was to what exent EISA compensated for the > shortcomings of ISA devices. The statement I addressed from the original poster was that shared interrupts for ISA devices is a driver problem. This is simply not true, and I feel that it needs to be pointed out regardless of whether the topic was EISA or not. Alex
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSI.3.91.960720081526.29121A-100000>