Date: Mon, 15 Dec 1997 12:19:33 -0500 From: John Robert LoVerso <loverso@opengroup.org> To: "David E. Cross" <dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu> Cc: freebsd-afs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What to call ourselves? Message-ID: <199712151719.MAA28370@postman.opengroup.org> In-Reply-To: Message from "David E. Cross" <dec@phoenix.its.rpi.edu> <Pine.BSF.3.96.971215114536.5082A-100000@phoenix.its.rpi.edu> .
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> we need a 'sys' name for this port... > How does 'fbsdx86_22' sound? Sys names have historically been "arch_system". I.e., See this (dated, but accurate) file: /afs/transarc.com/service/systypes We've already been using "i386_fbsd21" and "i386_fbsd22" (see /afs/ri.osf.org/vice/i386_fbsd21). I suggest you stick with that format. Note that "i386" is (unfortunately) generic for the Intel family and is used as such in many other PC-UNIX ports (i386_linux2 and i386_nbsd1, for instance). John John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712151719.MAA28370>