Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 19:08:36 -0800 (PST) From: root@FreeBSD.ORG (Root hub.FreeBSD.ORG) To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: removing restriction on who can send email to freebsd-security Message-ID: <20030205030836.D875D37B401@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Folks, please take a look at the following emails...these were rejected from FreeBSD-security due to a policy of restricting to only those subscribed to the list at the address subscribed to the list. while well-intentioned, this policy has unintended results. i have removed the restriction. please contact me at postmaster@freebsd.org if you wish to discuss the matter....i am open to your responses. jmb From: Richard Nyberg <rnyberg@it.su.se> To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Subject: patch for broken krb5 telnet Message-ID: <20030131151944.GA335@gromit.it.su.se> Mail-Followup-To: Richard Nyberg <rnyberg@it.su.se>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Hi there! I just wanted yo make you aware that there is a patch for krb5 telnet from bg@sics.se available at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/45397. With this patch telnet no longer dumps core and it uses subkeys properly. It'd be nice to have krb5 telnet work out of the box in FreeBSD; it's been broken for quite some time now :( --- Happy hacking! -Richard From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: bas <steendijk@xs4all.nl> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: krb5-realm.com Message-ID: <20030201214607.GA16797@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <v04210102ba60a5a98b9c@[192.168.1.27]> <3E3B1D71.21CFBD42@ursine.com> <20030201015129.GA27949@rfc822.net> <20030131181815.A42597@greg.cex.ca> <3E3B9B03. 6ACE7B96@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3E3B9B03.6ACE7B96@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i --GvXjxJ+pjyke8COw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 11:01:39AM +0100, bas wrote: > isnt it a bad thing if every sshd on the world ends up contacting > krb5-realm.com by default? is this also true for newer versions of sshd > (with kerberos disabled)? i mean it may make the owners of > krb5-realm.com powerful beings. sounds a bit .NET to me. What evidence do you have that this is true? Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030205030836.D875D37B401>