Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 14:54:06 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: do we need full kernel sources to compile loadable modules ? Message-ID: <20020305145406.A37648@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20020305230738.C13979@phoenix.dmnshq.net>; from eivind@FreeBSD.ORG on Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:07:38PM %2B0100 References: <20020305134932.A79697@iguana.icir.org> <20020305230738.C13979@phoenix.dmnshq.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:07:38PM +0100, Eivind Eklund wrote: > There is probably similar problems with newbus. We have previously talked > about making vnode_if.src be handled similar to syscalls.master - ie, generate > files from it, then commit those files. I think this would be a mistake. We should strive to not commit the generated form of syscalls.master. We've seen just too often people forget to do this. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020305145406.A37648>