Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:53:25 -0800
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org>
To:        eqe@cox.net
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: why support alpha??
Message-ID:  <20031210035325.GA34845@dragon.nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <200312092243.02269.eqe@cox.net>
References:  <200312092243.02269.eqe@cox.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:43:02PM -0500, eqe@cox.net wrote:
> Isn't alpha dead? Why bother supporting them in 5.2 it seems like wasted
> energy. Yes people still use it but for them there is 4.9 which works
> fine. You could better serve the freebsd community by focusing on the
> future of computing like amd64, great dual support, better drivers, etc.
> and most people know this, so why not let alpha die. I personally like
> alpha but it has no future.


What is the purpose of this email?!?
I work at AMD, have several AMD64 machines at my disposal, and yet I
still had an interest to fire my Alpha and test FreeBSD 5.2-RC on it.
So what's your point?

-- 
-- David  (obrien@FreeBSD.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031210035325.GA34845>