Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 09 Oct 2002 10:29:29 +0300
From:      Kim Helenius <kim.helenius@kepa.fi>
To:        Josh Paetzel <friar_josh@webwarrior.net>
Cc:        JoeB <barbish@a1poweruser.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Puzzling NATD problem - revisited
Message-ID:  <3DA3DAD9.4020906@kepa.fi>
References:  <3DA2D9D0.6050908@kepa.fi> <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGGEGJCMAA.barbish@a1poweruser.com> <20021009061602.GE57870@ns1.webwarrior.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thank you both for your answers. The campus network uses public ip 
address space, sorry for not including that information. The fact why I 
included it in between the internet and the natd gateway is that if 
there's some weirdness in it, I somehow have to compensate for it in 
FreeBSD. As I stated, Linux users haven't had any problems with nat in 
the same network. Even I had working nat in the same network two years 
ago (on FreeBSD 4.1-4.3 I think) so I'm trying to pinpoint the cause for 
this extremely peculiar behaviour.

Josh Paetzel wrote:

>On Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 03:28:28PM -0400, JoeB wrote:
>  
>
>>You state Network topology:
>>Internet---Campus Network---(xl0)FreeBSD NATD machine(xl1)---Internal host
>>
>>Internet is public ip address,  if Campus Network private ip address then
>>you can not nat them again, if Campus Network  is public ip address then  you
>>should nat x11 for the private ip address on the lan behind the FBSD box.
>>    
>>
>That's not correct.  I've seen two layers of NATD work just fine in an office 
>building environment where the gateway to the office was natting ips to the 
>individual clients, and then clients were natting again to hang multiple 
>machines off the one ip they got from the office gateway.
>
>Josh 
>  
>
"You should nat x11 for the private ip address on the lan behind the 
FBSD box."
I always thought natd should run on the external interface? How can natd 
work perfectly if I'm running it on a wrong interface?

>  
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
>>[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Kim Helenius
>>Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:13 AM
>>To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
>>Subject: Puzzling NATD problem - revisited
>>
>>The setting:
>>
>>Network topology:
>>Internet---Campus Network---(xl0)FreeBSD NATD machine(xl1)---Internal host
>>
>>A custom kernel build including the following options:
>>options IPFIREWALL
>>options IPDIVERT
>>Used the command:
>>sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding=1
>>And started natd with natd -interface xl0
>>
>>Then did, straight from the manpage, the following firewall rules:
>>/sbin/ipfw -f flush
>>/sbin/ipfw add divert natd all from any to any via xl0
>>/sbin/ipfw add pass all from any to any
>>
>>Now NAT works perfectly for the internal host, but (almost) all TCP
>>connections cease to work to/from the NATD machine. AFAIK UDP and ICMP work
>>perfectly. I've tried this on two different FreeBSD machines in the same
>>network with identical results. If I remove the divert rule, everything
>>works perfectly, except of course for the NAT. There have been no similar,
>>puzzling effects on any Linux hosts I know of in the same network. Therefore
>>I'm sure there's some knob I haven't pushed yet :)
>>
>>I'm aware this doesn't make much of a firewall but I'd like to get natd
>>working before I run the firewall script.
>>
>>--
>>Kim Helenius
>>kim.helenius@kepa.fi
>>
>>
>>
>>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>>with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>>
>>
>>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>>with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
>>    
>>
-- 
Kim Helenius
kim.helenius@kepa.fi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DA3DAD9.4020906>