Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2001 20:23:42 -0700 From: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com> To: David Raistrick <drais@wow.atlasta.net> Cc: "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com>, Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: RELENG_4_3 calls itself -RELEASE? Message-ID: <20010802202342.A7987@freeway.dcfinc.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108021939220.88953-100000@wow.atlasta.net>; from drais@wow.atlasta.net on Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 07:42:56PM -0700 References: <20010802190716.A7770@freeway.dcfinc.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0108021939220.88953-100000@wow.atlasta.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 07:42:56PM -0700, David Raistrick wrote: > > > Yes, but then the newbies would think this was some special release > > with extra security features. And complain when they get rooted. > > We go through "why isn't -STABLE really stable" three or four times > > per year. > > > > I'd rather a tag that didn't imply some kind of promise. > > Agreed...If it just said -REL_ENG it would be fine, wouldnt it? Except > that doesnt stable turn INTO REL_ENG in/during/around the prerelease code > freeze? No, it turns into "Release Candidate" -RC[1-9]. > maybe -RELEASE-1 -RELEASE-2 for each update that hits REL_ENG? or even > -RELEASE-yearmonthday ala -STABLE? I suppose the later would make more > sense... I could even live with "-RELEASE+". -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.com DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010802202342.A7987>