Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 12:57:32 +0200 From: "Adrian Penisoara" <ady@freebsd.ady.ro> To: "Christopher Hall" <christopherhall.hsw@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Kloss <klossalex@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help needed porting Quod Libet plugins Message-ID: <78cb3d3f0808050357g7f0ab5a7v615bd17cecde5e3c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <ED31C50E-6E91-4CE7-B944-06C941DF3C4F@gmail.com> References: <5151c41d0808031258m5c0c35eeu63c24935afa05b1f@mail.gmail.com> <ED31C50E-6E91-4CE7-B944-06C941DF3C4F@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 3:45 AM, Christopher Hall <christopherhall.hsw@gmail.com> wrote: >> The plugins are single-file Python scripts, which you simply drop into >> /usr/local/share/quodlibet/plugins/ and then enable in Quod Libet. In >> order to download them, you must pull them from Quod Libet's trunk in >> Subversion. This doesn't sound like a good idea to me, because there's >> no way to guarantee that a given plugin will remain stable all the >> time. If I ported a plugin, is it advisable to pull the distfile from >> trunk? > > What about pulling a particular Subversion revision that is the way I did it > I had a do-fetch target that fetched the subversion revision to a > subdirectory > in /usr/ports/distfiles then used tar to make a file-rev.tar.bz2. Then just > carry on as normal. I do not want to clutter the list with this Makefile > I could send to directly if you think it might help. > What about overriding the fetch and extract targets altogether with the above steps (e.g. the "fetch" target to do a "svn co" and the "extract" target just to place the proper files under $WRKSRC) ? Regards, Adrian.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?78cb3d3f0808050357g7f0ab5a7v615bd17cecde5e3c>