Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 07:19:40 -0800 From: "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> To: "Bruce Evans" <bde@zeta.org.au>, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@ofug.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Checksum/copy Message-ID: <09e701c2f606$a0a79890$52557f42@errno.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303260956250.27748-100000@root.org><20030327180247.D1825@gamplex.bde.org><20030327232742.GA80113@wantadilla.lemis.com><20030328161552.L5953@gamplex.bde.org><20030328073513.GA20464@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au><xzp3cl61hxs.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no><20030329235643.H11074@gamplex.bde.org> <xzpznneyzmi.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> IMHO, if specialized pagezero() and pagecopy() functions result in
> measurably improved performance, they're worth the added complexity,
> even if we're just talking about a few percent.
Please show they are worth it before adding this complexity.
Sam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?09e701c2f606$a0a79890$52557f42>