Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 15:35:56 +0300 From: "Petri Helenius" <pete@he.iki.fi> To: "Luigi Rizzo" <rizzo@icir.org>, "Mike Silbersack" <silby@silby.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Review needed: Mbuf double-free detection patch Message-ID: <003901c30fde$37f2a0f0$932a40c1@PHE> References: <20030430142532.F3741@odysseus.silby.com> <20030501041210.A3514@xorpc.icir.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > [on a side note, it is a bit depressing to see the same > code replicated twice, in m_free() and m_freem(). Couldn't > one try to make m_freem() just call m_free() in a loop and > save some code bloat ? I doubt the extra function call > would harm performance too much.] > Allocating / freeing mbufs is quite expensive already so it probably does not make that huge a difference. However the direction should be to improve the perfomance. Pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?003901c30fde$37f2a0f0$932a40c1>